
Ngetop
FollowOverview
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 16
Company Description
Perplexity Lets you Try DeepSeek R1 without the Security Risk, however it’s Still Censored
Chinese startup DeepSeek AI and its open-source language models took control of the news cycle today. Besides being comparable to models like Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s o1, the models have actually raised several issues about information personal privacy, security, and Chinese-government-enforced censorship within their training.
AI search platform Perplexity and AI assistant You.com have discovered a method around that, albeit with some limitations.
Also: I evaluated DeepSeek’s R1 and V3 coding skills – and we’re not all doomed (yet)
On Monday, Perplexity published on X that it now hosts DeepSeek R1. The free strategy gives users 3 Pro-level queries each day, which you might utilize with R1, but you’ll require the $20 each month Pro plan to gain access to it more than that.
DeepSeek R1 is now offered on Perplexity to support deep web research study. There’s a new Pro Search reasoning mode selector, together with OpenAI o1, with transparent chain of believed into design’s thinking. We’re increasing the number of daily uses for both complimentary and paid as add more … pic.twitter.com/KIJWpPPJVN
In another post, the business confirmed that it hosts DeepSeek “in US/EU data centers – your data never leaves Western servers,” ensuring users that their data would be safe if using the open-source models on Perplexity.
“None of your data goes to China,” Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas restated in a LinkedIn post.
Also: Apple scientists reveal the secret sauce behind DeepSeek AI
DeepSeek’s AI assistant, powered by both its V3 and R1 models, is available via web browser or app– but those require interaction with the business’s China-based servers, which creates a security risk. Users who download R1 and run it locally on their devices will prevent that concern, but still run into censorship of particular subjects figured out by the Chinese federal government, as it’s integrated in by default.
As part of offering R1, Perplexity claimed it removed a minimum of a few of the censorship developed into the design. Srinivas posted a screenshot on X of inquiry results that acknowledge the president of Taiwan.
However, when I asked R1 about Tiananmen Square using Perplexity, the model declined to respond to.
When I asked R1 if it is trained not to address certain concerns determined by the Chinese government, it responded that it’s developed to “focus on accurate info” and “avoid political commentary,” and that its “stresses neutrality in worldwide affairs” and “cultural level of sensitivity.”
“We have actually removed the censorship weights on the model, so it shouldn’t behave in this manner,” stated a Perplexity agent reacting to ZDNET’s request for remark, including that they were looking into the issue.
Also: What to learn about DeepSeek AI, from expense claims to information personal privacy
You.com provides both V3 and R1, similarly only through its Pro tier, which is $15 monthly (discounted from the typical $20) and without any free questions. In addition to access to all the models You.com offers, the Pro plan features file uploads of up to 25MB per question, a 64k maximum context window, and access to research study and custom-made representatives.
Bryan McCann, You.com cofounder and CTO, explained in an email to ZDNET that users can access R1 and V3 through the platform in 3 ways, all of which use “an unmodified, open source variation of the DeepSeek designs hosted totally within the United States to ensure user privacy.”
“The very first, default method is to utilize these models within the context of our proprietary trust layer. This offers the designs access to public web sources, a bias towards citing those sources, and an inclination to respect those sources while generating responses,” McCann continued. “The second method is for users to turn off access to public web sources within their source controls or by utilizing the designs as part of Custom Agents. This alternative permits users to check out the models’ special capabilities and behavior when not grounded in the general public web. The third method is for users to test the limitations of these designs as part of a Custom-made Agent by adding their own directions, files, and sources.”
Also: The very best open-source AI designs: All your free-to-use alternatives described
McCann noted that You.com compared DeepSeek designs’ reactions based on whether it had access to web sources. “We discovered that the models’ reactions varied on several political subjects, in some cases refusing to address on certain concerns when public web sources were not consisted of,” he discusses.